Distinguishing a text written by a real writer from one produced by a casual journalist using ChatGPT can be done by paying attention to several aspects:
A writer has a recognizable voice, a unique style forged through years of reading and writing. Their text may contain a particular musicality and rhythm, original, even poetic turns of phrase, as well as a rich vocabulary and striking images, a coherent and personal vision of the world.
Conversely, a text produced quickly with ChatGPT or by a casual journalist may seem more standardized, with generic wording and a smooth flow.
A true writer explores their ideas, developing them with nuance and subtlety. They can:
Follow an elaborate narrative or argumentative thread.
Introduce subtexts and implicit references.
Take the time to surprise, divert, and delve deeper. A text produced with ChatGPT, even if well-written, often has a more linear logic, with predictable conclusions and an often academic structure (introduction, body, conclusion without any rough edges).
Writers draw on their life experience, their own culture, and their personal obsessions, using unexpected comparisons and metaphors. However, texts produced with ChatGPT tend to recycle popular references or offer conventional images.
A writer takes liberties, dares to use longer sentences, changes in tone, and bold syntactic approaches. Their text can provoke a deep emotional reaction. In contrast, a text produced quickly by a journalist using AI is often more consensual, seeking to appeal to as many readers as possible, avoiding any rough edges that could make it too singular.
If the text seems too smooth, too efficient in its structure, but without any rough edges or real stylistic surprises, there’s a good chance it was written with AI or was an opportunistic commission. A true writer leaves a recognizable mark, a depth of thought, a style, and a sense of humor that are all their own.
FM
Aucune réponse